New publication: Collaboration between Training and Movement Science and Sport Psychology

Motivational intervention improves physical performance by improving movement efficiency.

As part of a collaboration, Louis-Solal Giboin, Markus Gruber (both with the chair of Training and Movement Science), Julia Schüler and Wanja Wolff (both with the chair of Sport Psychology) published the paper "Investigating Performance in a Strenuous Physical Task from the Perspective of Self-Control" in the journal Brain Science. The authors investigated, for the first time, the relationship between self-control and the regulation of a strenuous physical task with an innovative protocol that combined neuroimaging and measurements of psychological and physiological resource depletion. The authors showed that a shift in motivation that improves performance may not necessarily come from a higher amount of resource depletion (as hypothesized), but from a higher task efficiency.

Abstract of the paper: It has been proposed that one reason physical effort is perceived as costly is because of the self-control demands that are necessary to persist in a physically demanding task. The application of control has been conceptualized as a value-based decision, that hinges on an optimization of the costs of control and available reward. Here, we drew on labor supply theory to investigate the effects of an Income Compensated Wage Decrease (ICWD) on persistence in a strenuous physical task. Research has shown that an ICWD reduced the amount of self-control participants are willing to apply, and we expected this to translate to a performance decrement in a strenuous physical task. Contrary to our expectations, participants in the ICWD group outperformed the control group in terms of persistence, without incurring higher levels of muscle fatigue or ratings of perceived exertion. Improved performance was accompanied by increases in task efficiency and a lesser increase in oxygenation of the prefrontal cortex, an area of relevance for the application of self-control. These results suggest that the relationship between the regulation of physical effort and self-control is less straightforward than initially assumed: less top-down self-control might allow for more efficient execution of motor tasks, thereby allowing for improved performance. Moreover, these findings indicate that psychological manipulations can affect physical performance, not by modulating how much one is willing to deplete limited physical resources, but by altering how tasks are executed. 

Full paperhere:

Citation: Giboin, L.-S.; Gruber, M.; Schüler, J.; Wolff, W. Investigating Performance in a Strenuous Physical Task from the Perspective of Self-Control. Brain Sci. 2019, 9, 317.